Overview

A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary Stenting With or Without Abciximab, an Anti-Platelet Therapy, and Conventional Coronary Angioplasty With Abciximab

Status:
Completed
Trial end date:
1997-09-01
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
All
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of intracoronary stenting with or without abciximab, an anti-platelet therapy, and conventional coronary angioplasty with abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Phase:
Phase 3
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
No
Details
Lead Sponsor:
Centocor, Inc.
Treatments:
Abciximab
Antibodies, Monoclonal
Calcium heparin
Heparin
Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients referred for elective or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention

- Who are suitable candidates for either conventional angioplasty or primary
intracoronary stent implantation

- Having a target artery (native or graft) stenosis of >= 60% (visual estimation)

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within the previous 12
hours

- With a planned staged procedure or having an unprotected left main coronary artery
stenosis > 50%

- With active internal bleeding, having a condition that may increase the risk of
bleeding, or receiving ongoing treatment with an oral anticoagulant at the time of
study entry

- Having had a percutaneous coronary intervention within the previous 3 months or prior
intracoronary stent placement in a target vessel

- Having hypertension with systolic blood pressure > 180 mm Hg or diastolic blood
pressure > 100 mm Hg at the time of study entry, or a platelet count < 100,000/μL at
baseline