Overview
Analgesic Efficacy of Two Concentrations of Bupivacaine in Women in Labor
Status:
Completed
Completed
Trial end date:
2013-10-01
2013-10-01
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
Female
Female
Summary
Abstract. Epidural analgesia is the most safe and effective for the treatment of pain of childbirth method. Epidural Bupivacaine provided excellent analgesia for labor and remains the most widely used local anesthetic in obstetric anesthesia. Objective: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of two concentrations of bupivacaine in women in labor. Methods: 114 patients were included in labor with term pregnancy. Were grouped randomly into two groups: patients who received bupivacaine 0.125 % (Group A) and 0.25% bupivacaine (group B). Patients in group A received 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine bolus. The patients in group B received 10 ml. Bupivacaine 0.25% bolus. Pain intensity according to VAS, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, degree of motor block was assessed using the Bromage scale at different periods of time. Results: Demographic characteristics and parity were compared, no statistically significant differences. By comparing the values of the VAS measure 0, 15, 30, 60 and 90 minutes into statistically significant differences in favor of the group with 0.25% Bupivacaine with decreased pain perception after 30 minutes, p-value found 0.02. No differences in arterial pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate were found between the two groups. Conclusion: The concentration of 0.25% Bupivacaine has greater analgesic efficacy compared with 0.125% bupivacaine.Phase:
Phase 4Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
NoDetails
Lead Sponsor:
Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, MexicoCollaborator:
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialTreatments:
Analgesics
Bupivacaine
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:- Women with normal pregnancy at term, with active labor, the American Society of
Anesthesiologists physical (ASA) st atus I or II.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with problems of language barriers, allergic to local anesthetics, which have
been submitted in the last quarter of any of the following situations: pregnancy
induced, placenta previa, abnormal fetal variety of presentation, cephalopelvic
disproportion, uterine hypertonic hypertensive disease ; Obstetric emergencies such as
severe preeclampsia, abruptio placenta detachment, acute fetal distress. Alterations
in the anatomy of the spine or previous surgeries that prevent or restrict the conduct
of epidural analgesia.