Anesthetic Efficacy of 1.8 ml Versus 3.6 ml of 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Trial end date: 2025-06-01
• Target enrollment: 0
• Participant gender: All

Summary

The aim of the study is to compare the anesthetic efficacy and need for supplemental anesthesia of 1.8 ml compared to 3.6 ml of 4% articaine buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

• Phase: N/A
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers?: No

Details

• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University
• Treatments: Carticaine

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Healthy patients who are categorized as I or II according to The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA class I or II).

2. No sex predilection

3. Patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis

4. Patient with the ability to understand and use pain scales.

5. Patients who accept to enroll in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients' allergies to any of the drugs or materials used in the study.

2. Pregnant and lactating females.

3. Patients taking analgesics in the last 6-8 hours.

4. Patients having more than one symptomatic tooth in the same quadrant