Overview
Chemotherapy Combined With Bevacizumab Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-negative Breast Cancer
Status:
Recruiting
Recruiting
Trial end date:
2025-12-31
2025-12-31
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
All
All
Summary
This is an prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical study.Phase:
Phase 4Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
NoDetails
Lead Sponsor:
Hebei Medical University Fourth HospitalTreatments:
Bevacizumab
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:1. Age ≥18 years old;
2. Signed the informed consent and volunteered to join the study with good compliance;
3, histopathologically confirmed HER2-negative invasive breast cancer (including
triple-negative breast cancer; Or Luminal breast cancer, that is, ER/PR positive and HER2
negative) :
- HER2 negative was defined as 0/1+ on standard IHC test; HER2/CEP17 ratio was less than
2.0 or HER2 gene copy number was less than 4.
- ER positive and/or PR positive were defined as the proportion of positively stained
tumor cells in all tumor cells ≥1%;
4. According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition TNM stage
II-IIIC (T2-T4 plus any N, or any T plus N1-3, M0);
5. The main organs function well and meet the following standards:
A) Hemoglobin (HGB)≥90g/L;
B) Neutrophil absolute value (NEUT)≥1.5×109/L;
C) Platelet count (PLT)≥ 100×109/L;
D) leukocyte ≥3.0×109/L;
E) Total bilirubin <1.5 ULN (upper limit of normal)
F) Creatinine < 1.5×ULN
G) AST/ALT < 1.5×ULN;
6. Cardiac ultrasound: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF≥55%);
7. The investigators determined that the patients were suitable for treatment with
bevacizumab.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Stage IV (metastatic) breast cancer;
2. Received treatment for the disease, including chemotherapy, endocrine therapy,
radiotherapy, immunotherapy, etc.;
3. Patients who are participating in other intervention studies;
4. Women with confirmed pregnancy or lactation;
5. According to the judgment of the investigator, the subjects have concomitant diseases
that seriously endanger the safety of the subjects or affect the completion of the
study, or the subjects think that there are other reasons that are not suitable for
inclusion.