Overview

Comparison Between Two Dose Levels of Daunorubicin and Between One vs. Two Induction Cycles for Adult Patients With AML

Status:
Recruiting
Trial end date:
2022-05-01
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
All
Summary
The proposed trial will address two clinically important questions for younger patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML): the optimal dose of daunorubicin in induction therapy and the necessity of a second induction cycle in patients with a good response after the first induction. The primary endpoint is the rate of good responders. Secondary outcomes will be relapse-free survival, overall survival and minimal residual disease kinetics. Patients will be recruited in about 40 treatment centers of the Study Alliance Leukemia study group over a period of 40 months. The results will be of great clinical relevance: First, the study could facilitate the establishment or confirmation of the optimal daunorubicin dose.
Phase:
Phase 3
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
No
Details
Lead Sponsor:
Technische Universität Dresden
Collaborators:
Masaryk University
Universitäts KrebsCentrum des Universitätsklinikums und der Medizinischen Fakultät an der TU Dresden
Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen Dresden (NCT/UCC)
Treatments:
Daunorubicin
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

- Newly diagnosed AML other than acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) according to WHO
criteria, i.e. bone marrow aspirate or biopsy must contain ≥20% blasts of all
nucleated cells or differential blood count must contain ≥20% blasts. In acute
erythroid leukemia, ≥20% blasts in all non-erythroid bone marrow cells. In AML defined
by cytogenetic aberrations, the rate of blasts may be <20%. Secondary AMLs are
eligible for inclusion.

- Age 18- inkl.65 years

- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2

- Adequate liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements
to be conducted within 7 days prior to screening:

- Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal

- alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) ≤ 2.5 times upper
limit of normal

- Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normalExclusion Criteria:

- Adequate cardiac function, i.e. left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥ 50% as
assessed by transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography ("M Mode") or multiple
gated acquisition scan (MUGA scan)

- Signed informed consent

- Women must fulfill at least one of the following criteria in order to be eligible for
trial inclusion:

- Post-menopausal (12 months of natural amenorrhea or 6 months of amenorrhea with
Serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) > 40 U/ml)

- Postoperative (i.e. 6 weeks) after bilateral ovariectomy with or without
hysterectomy

- Continuous and correct application of a contraception method with a Pearl Index
of <1% (e.g. implants, depots, oral contraceptives, intrauterine device - IUD).

- Sexual abstinence

- Vasectomy of the sexual partner

Exclusion criteria:

- Patients who are not eligible for standard chemotherapy as assessed by the treating
physician

- Central nervous system manifestation of AML

- Cardiac disease: i.e. heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV;
unstable coronary artery disease (MI more than 6 months prior to study entry is
permitted); serious cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy

- Patients undergoing renal dialysis

- Chronic pulmonary disease with clinical relevant hypoxia

- Known HIV or Hepatitis infection

- Uncontrolled active infection

- Medical conditions other than AML with an estimated life expectancy below 6 months

- Previous treatment of AML except hydroxyurea up to 5 days

- Relapsed or primary refractory AML

- Acute promyelocytic leukemia

- Previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy

- Treatment with any known non-marketed drug substance or experimental therapy within 4
weeks prior to enrollment

- Incapability of understanding purpose and possible consequences of the trial

- Pregnant or breastfeeding women

- Evidence suggesting that the patient is not likely to follow the study protocol (e.g.
lacking compliance)