Overview
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Among Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Status:
Unknown status
Unknown status
Trial end date:
2018-12-01
2018-12-01
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
All
All
Summary
1. The recent development of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), could potentially overcome many drawbacks of warfarin, and might provide a safer, and even more effective and convenient alternative approach to warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), especially in Asians. 2. According to the results of a meta-analysis comparing Asians and non-Asians, NOACs are preferentially indicated in Asians in terms of both efficacy and safety. 3. There is no randomized controlled trial with sufficient power to directly compare the efficacy and safety among NOACs in NVAF, not to speak of Asians and Chinese. 4. Indirect comparisons are only based on observation with a lot of limitations such as heterogeneous background characteristics, difference in study design, and diversity in time within therapeutic range in control group. The findings from indirect comparisons are not conclusive but only hypothesis-generating. 5. This investigator-initiated prospective randomized open blinded end-point clinical trial will directly compare the efficacy and safety among 3 NOACs in patients with NVAF in Taiwan. We hypothesize that rivaroxaban or apixaban is non-inferior to dabigatran in terms of the efficacy.Phase:
Phase 4Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
NoDetails
Lead Sponsor:
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalCollaborators:
E-DA Hospital
Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital Dou-Liou Branch
Tainan Municipal HospitalTreatments:
Apixaban
Dabigatran
Rivaroxaban
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Known AF (paroxysmal or persistent/ permanent) who are suitable andready for NOAC treatment plus at least one of the following criteria
- Prior ischemic stroke, transient ischemic accident or systemic embolism
- Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (documented by echocardiography or contrast
ventriculography)
- Symptomatic congestive heart failure (≥ New York Heart Association Functional Class 2)
within 6 months before screening
- Age ≥75 years
- Age ≥65 but <75 years with diabetes mellitus, hypertension or coronary artery disease
Exclusion Criteria: Subjects are excluded if they have at least one of the following
situations before screening:
- Known severe (i.e. hemodynamically significant) mitral stenosis regardless of having
received operation
- Time elapsed from the onset of stroke ≤7 days
- Bleeding tendency
- Creatinine clearance rate ≤30 mL/min
- Known active liver disease (persistent elevation of alanine aminotransferase,
aspartate transaminase or alkaline phosphatase ≥3 × upper normal limit; or advanced
liver cirrhosis ≥Pugh B)
- Pregnancy
- Recent documented active malignancy or radiation therapy (≤6 months) and not expected
to survive 3 years
- Unwilling to give informed consent
- Conditions other than AF that required anticoagulation
- Anemia (hemoglobin level <90 g/L) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 × 109/L)
- Persistent uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg or diastolic
blood pressure >100 mmHg)
- Active infective endocarditis
- Patients considered unreliable by the investigator or have a life expectancy less than
the expected duration of the trial because of concomitant disease, or has any
condition which in the opinion of the investigator, would not allow safe participation
in the study