Overview
Effect of Vildagliptin vs. Glibenclamide on Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cell Number Type 2 Diabetes
Status:
Completed
Completed
Trial end date:
2015-01-01
2015-01-01
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
All
All
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) -IV inhibitor Vildagliptin vs. Glibenclamide on circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) number in type 2 diabetes patients in metformin failure. Subjects will be followed for 12 months after randomization.Phase:
Phase 3Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
NoDetails
Lead Sponsor:
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di ParmaTreatments:
Glyburide
Metformin
Vildagliptin
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:- Age equal or above 35 years;
- Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus as defined by the American Diabetes Association
, with at least one year of disease duration at the time of the screening visit;
- Blood glucose lowering treatment with Metformin alone (monotherapy) at a stable dose
of at least 1.5 g/day (or maximum tolerated dose) in the 3 months prior to the
screening visit;
- Insufficient metabolic control as defined by recent (last six months) HbA1c ≥ 7% in
any peripheral laboratory and confirmed at the time of the screening;
- Absence of a recent clinically-relevant progression of micro- and macro-vascular
complications (see exclusion criteria);
- Written informed consent to participate to the study.
Exclusion criteria:
- Age below 35 years
- Type 1 diabetes or other causes of diabetes (pancreatectomy, gestational diabetes,
etc.)
- HbA1c < 7% or ≥ 9% at the screening visit
- Treatment with any blood glucose lowering treatment other than Metformin in the six
months before screening visit
- BMI < 20 or ≥ 40 kg/m2, or current/ past history of clinically-relevant eating
disorders (including -but no limited to- nervous anorexia, bulimia, binge-eating
disorders, etc.)
- Significant progression of diabetic macro-angiopathy or cardiovascular disease in the
six months prior to study visit
- Significant progression of diabetic micro-angiopathy in the six months prior to study
visit
- Organ failure or other severe diseases limiting life expectancy;
- Beginning, in the three months before screening visit, of any kind of drug which can
modify glycemic levels (beta-blockers, diuretics…), or acute disease (acute infection,
urinary tract infection…) in three months before screening visit
- History of inflammatory/infective/autoimmune chronic disease
- History of unexplained pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, gastric
surgery, inflammatory bowel disease;
- Any clinically significant abnormality identified on physical examination, laboratory
tests, ECG or vital signs at screening that in the judgment of the investigator would
preclude safe completion of the study;
- Uncontrolled or inadequately controlled hypertension at screening (Systolic Blood
Pressure (SBP)>190 or Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) >100 mmHg)
- Ongoing pregnancy or absence of effective contraception in women with childbearing
potential
- Contraindications to the maintenance of the background therapy (Metformin), including
-but not limited to- chronic kidney failure or plasma creatinine concentrations > 1.5
mg/dL, severe respiratory failure, etc.;
- Contraindications to the use of a Sulfonylurea;
- Contraindications to the use of a DPP-IV Inhibitor;
- Laboratory findings, or other disease conditions, at the screening visit that might
interfere with study measurements:
1. Hemoglobinopathy known to affect HbA1c assays;
2. Known chronic liver diseases, including HBV (hepatitis B virus) and HCV
(hepatitis C virus) infection;
3. Liver makers (aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT),
alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) , bilirubin) above 2
times the upper normal limit;
4. Amylase and/or lipase above 2 times the upper normal limit;
- Chronic use of systemic and/or inhaled corticosteroids (only topical corticosteroids
are allowed);
- History of low compliance, clinically-relevant psychiatric disorders or any current/
historical finding suggesting the patient as inappropriate to follow the study
procedures.