Effects of Two Different Sedation Regimes on Auditory Evoked Potentials and Electroencephalogram (EEG)

• Status: Completed
• Trial end date: 2004-06-01
• Target enrollment: 0
• Participant gender: Male

Summary

Sedation may be necessary in intensive care to facilitate diverse therapeutic interventions, but the use of sedative drugs may increase the risk of delirium and long-term cognitive impairment. Thus the implementation and monitoring of sedation remains difficult despite the use of sedation protocols and clinical sedation scores. Attempts to improve sedation monitoring through the use of the electroencephalogram(EEG) have been disappointing. Derived variables based on the unstimulated EEG fail to predict the response to external stimuli at the clinically most relevant light-to-moderate sedation levels, and the overlap between moderate and deep sedation levels is wide. We have demonstrated that long-latency auditory evoked potentials (ERPs)can be used to avoid deep levels of sedation in healthy volunteers during propofol sedation, independent of the concomitant administration of remifentanil. This approach has a potential clinical application for improved monitoring of sedation. Since the effects of different sedative drugs on the EEG may vary widely, the use of ERPs to monitor sedation needs to be evaluated with different sedative drugs. Therefore we will administer two widely used drug combinations (dexmedetomidine/remifentanil and midazolam/remifentanil) in healthy volunteers and record ERPS and processed EEG during clinical relevant sedation levels

• Phase: N/A
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers?: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Details

• Lead Sponsor: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne
• Collaborator: GE Healthcare
• Treatments: Dexmedetomidine; Midazolam; Remifentanil

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• age 18 years and older

• healthy

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of problems during anesthesia

• Impairment of the auditory system