Overview

Efficacy and Safety of Nafamostat Mesylate for ECMO Anticoagulation

Status:
Not yet recruiting
Trial end date:
2024-10-01
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
All
Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesylate and unfractionated heparin during ECMO anticoagulation in critically ill patients.
Phase:
Phase 2
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
No
Details
Lead Sponsor:
Wuhan Union Hospital, China
Treatments:
Calcium heparin
Heparin
Nafamostat
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients aged >= 18 and <= 75 years;

- Successfully established ECMO (VA/VV) treatment by percutaneous puncture due to
cardiogenic shock or respiratory failure;

- Anticoagulation required during ECMO treatment; Before the establishment of ECMO, the
APTT test value was within the normal range, and the platelets were not less than
80G/L;

- Within 48 hours of ECMO establishment, APTT test results were between 1 and 1.75 times
the upper limit of normal, PLT>80 G/L, and no serious bleeding and thrombosis;

- Sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Pregnant;

- Bleeding risk or active bleeding;

- Pre-existing diseases requiring long-term anticoagulation before ECMO: pulmonary
embolism, deep vein thrombosis, intraventricular thrombosis, atrial fibrillation,
etc.;

- Long-term use of anticoagulants before ECMO;

- Antiplatelet drugs were used before ECMO;

- Allergy to heparin, nafamostat mesylate;

- Repeated puncture at the same site for more than 3 times;

- Expected ECMO treatment time < 3 days;

- Patients with an expected survival period of less than 48 hours;

- Patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation;

- Burn patients; Blood purification treatment using polyacrylonitrile membrane filter;

- Heterozygous ECMO mode or ECMO therapy solely for CO2 removal;

- Other reasons that the investigator considers inappropriate for inclusion;