Overview
Efficacy and Safety of Nafamostat Mesylate for ECMO Anticoagulation
Status:
Not yet recruiting
Not yet recruiting
Trial end date:
2024-10-01
2024-10-01
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
All
All
Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesylate and unfractionated heparin during ECMO anticoagulation in critically ill patients.Phase:
Phase 2Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
NoDetails
Lead Sponsor:
Wuhan Union Hospital, ChinaTreatments:
Calcium heparin
Heparin
Nafamostat
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:- Patients aged >= 18 and <= 75 years;
- Successfully established ECMO (VA/VV) treatment by percutaneous puncture due to
cardiogenic shock or respiratory failure;
- Anticoagulation required during ECMO treatment; Before the establishment of ECMO, the
APTT test value was within the normal range, and the platelets were not less than
80G/L;
- Within 48 hours of ECMO establishment, APTT test results were between 1 and 1.75 times
the upper limit of normal, PLT>80 G/L, and no serious bleeding and thrombosis;
- Sign the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant;
- Bleeding risk or active bleeding;
- Pre-existing diseases requiring long-term anticoagulation before ECMO: pulmonary
embolism, deep vein thrombosis, intraventricular thrombosis, atrial fibrillation,
etc.;
- Long-term use of anticoagulants before ECMO;
- Antiplatelet drugs were used before ECMO;
- Allergy to heparin, nafamostat mesylate;
- Repeated puncture at the same site for more than 3 times;
- Expected ECMO treatment time < 3 days;
- Patients with an expected survival period of less than 48 hours;
- Patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation;
- Burn patients; Blood purification treatment using polyacrylonitrile membrane filter;
- Heterozygous ECMO mode or ECMO therapy solely for CO2 removal;
- Other reasons that the investigator considers inappropriate for inclusion;