Overview

Efficacy of Oral Tobacco Products Compared to a Medicinal Nicotine

Status:
Completed
Trial end date:
2014-05-01
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
All
Summary
For the primary goals, we hypothesize that 1) the oral tobacco product will be more efficacious than the medicinal nicotine product in substituting for smoking cigarettes; 2) among non-abstainers, the oral tobacco product will lead to greater reduction in cigarette smoking than medicinal nicotine; and 3) a higher rate of oral tobacco compared to medicinal nicotine use will be observed during and beyond the treatment period. For the secondary goals, we hypothesize that 1) both products will equally reduce withdrawal symptoms from cigarette abstinence; and 2) the toxicant exposure and toxicity will be reduced dramatically when smokers switch from cigarettes to each of these products; however, this reduction will be greater with the use of medicinal nicotine.
Phase:
Phase 2
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Details
Lead Sponsor:
University of Minnesota
University of Minnesota - Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Collaborators:
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Treatments:
Nicotine
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

- smoking at least 10 cigarettes daily for the past year,

- in good physical health (no unstable medical condition;

- no contraindications for medicinal nicotine, as appropriate for the study, stable,
good mental health (e.g., no recent unstable or untreated psychiatric diagnosis,
including substance abuse, as determined by the DSM-IV criteria).

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects must not be currently using other tobacco or nicotine products; Female subjects
cannot be pregnant or nursing.