Overview
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block
Status:
Unknown status
Unknown status
Trial end date:
2020-12-01
2020-12-01
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
All
All
Summary
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of paravertebral block and erector spinae plane block after mastectomy. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to demonstrate equivalent dermatomal spread for ultrasound-guided single-injection Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block performed at T4-T5 level and ultrasound-guided single-injection (paravertebral) PVB block at the same level. Secondary objectives are Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores in the first 24 post-operative hours, opioid analgesia use intra-operatively and in the first 24 post-operative hours, block procedural time and patient discomfort during block insertion. The investigators hypothesize that ESP block efficacy is not inferior to PVB with reference to dermatomal sensory spread and analgesic efficacy, while being easier to perform with less associated discomfort during block insertion.Phase:
N/AAccepts Healthy Volunteers?
NoDetails
Lead Sponsor:
University of AlbertaTreatments:
Analgesics, Opioid
Anesthetics
Anesthetics, General
Anesthetics, Local
Bupivacaine
Ropivacaine
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:- Adult patients over 18 years
- Consented to a regional anesthesia technique for post-operative analgesia
- Partial or complete mastectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects <18 years
- those who refuse consent for PVB or ESP blockade,
- opioid tolerant patients
- psychiatric illness
- allergy to local anesthetic
- Local or systemic infection