Overview
Evaluating The Efficacy And Safety Of Donepezil Hydrochloride (Aricept) In The Treatment Of The Cognitive Dysfunction Exhibited By Children With Down Syndrome, Aged 6 To 10
Status:
Terminated
Terminated
Trial end date:
2008-12-01
2008-12-01
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
All
All
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of donepezil hydrochloride (Aricept) in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction shown by children with Down syndrome, aged 6 to 10 years.Phase:
Phase 3Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
NoDetails
Lead Sponsor:
Eisai Inc.Collaborator:
PfizerTreatments:
Donepezil
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:- Age range: Subjects 6 to 10 years of age at the screening visit; weight >= 15 kg.
- Sex distribution: both males and females.
- VABS-II/PCRF receptive sub-domain raw score of >= 25 and expressive sub-domain raw
score of >= 61.
- Clinical diagnosis of Down syndrome (DS) - subjects may have free trisomy 21,
Robertsonian translocations, or mosaic DS
- Naive to approved or unapproved cholinesterase inhibitors (Aricept, Exelon, Cognex,
Reminyl/Razadyne, metrifonate, physostigmine) is preferred. However, prior use of
these medications is allowed, provided that the medication was discontinued at least 3
months prior to screening and that it was not discontinued for lack of tolerability or
efficacy or for the sole purpose of enrolling the patient in the study. The exception
to this prior use is that subjects who participated in the Phase II study
E2020-A001-219 (A2501059) are not eligible.
- Subjects residing in the community or in facilities that have consistent and reliable
caregivers who can provide efficacy information about the subjects.
- The subjects must be expected to complete all procedures scheduled during the
Screening and Baseline visits including all efficacy and safety parameters. Subjects
who are verbal and able to be understood most of the time are preferred, but those who
use other forms of communication, signs, symbol boards or devices to supplement
his/her communication ability may be enrolled provided they meet the VABS-II/PCRF
receptive and expressive score criteria mentioned above.
- Subjects must have a parent, or other reliable caregiver who agrees to accompany the
subject to all clinic visits, provide information about the subject as required by the
protocol, and ensure compliance with the medication schedule.
- The parent or caregiver must be a constant and reliable informant with sufficient
contact with the subject to have detailed knowledge of the subject's adaptive
functioning in order to be able to complete the VABS-II/PCRF accurately. The same
individual should complete the form at every visit if possible.
- Subjects should be in good general health with no medical conditions that are
considered both clinically significant and unstable.
- Clinical laboratory values within normal limits or abnormalities considered not
clinically significant by the investigator and sponsor.
- Subjects with stable Type I (insulin-dependent) or Type II diabetes are eligible
provided they are monitored regularly prior to and during the study to ensure adequate
glucose control. (Adequacy of control is based on the investigator's judgment, but
should be guided primarily by a glycosylated hemoglobin [hemoglobin A1c] <8.0 at
screening; other information, including records of home monitoring and the screening
fasting glucose may support this judgment.)
- Subjects with thyroid disease also may be included in the study provided they are
euthyroid and stable on treatment for at least 1 month prior to screening.
- Subjects with a history of seizure disorder are allowed provided that they are on
stable treatment for at least 3 months and have not had a seizure within the past 6
months.
- Subjects should be independent in ambulation or ambulatory aided (i.e., walker or
cane, to wheelchair); vision and hearing (eyeglasses and/or hearing aid permissible)
sufficient for achieving VABS-II/PCRF minimum receptive raw scores of >= 25 and
expressive scores of >= 61 and for cooperating with secondary efficacy evaluations and
study examinations.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age range: Subjects <6 or >10 years at the screening visit.
- Subjects with active or clinically significant conditions that will, in the
investigator's judgment, affect absorption, distribution or metabolism of the study
medication (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease, gastric or duodenal ulcers or severe
lactose intolerance); controlled celiac disease is allowed.
- Subjects with a known hypersensitivity to piperidine derivatives or cholinesterase
inhibitors.
- Subjects currently receiving cholinesterase inhibitors or who have received them in
the 3 months prior to screening or with prior use >3 months prior to screening who
stopped for lack of efficacy or tolerability or simply to enroll the subject in this
study. Also excluded are subjects who participated in the Phase II study
E2020-A001-219 (A2501059). In addition, subjects may not have taken any other
investigational medications (including memantine) within 3 months prior to screening.
- Subjects without a reliable parent or caregiver (caregiver responsibilities are
described in the Inclusion Criteria above), or with parents or caregivers who are
unwilling or unable to complete any of the outcome measures and fulfill the
requirements of this study.
- Subjects with clinically significant obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma,
untreated or not controlled by treatment within 3 months prior to screening.
- Subjects with recent (<= 1 year) or ongoing hematologic/oncologic disorders (mild
anemia allowed).
- Evidence of active, clinically significant, and unstable gastrointestinal, renal,
hepatic, endocrine or cardiovascular system disease.
- Subjects with a current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV)
diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) or any current primary psychiatric
diagnosis other than DS (as per DSM-IV). Diagnoses that are secondary, such as
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, are allowed.
- Any condition which would make the patient or the caregiver, in the opinion of the
investigator, unsuitable for the study.