Overview
Evaluation of Low-dose Darunavir in a Switch Study
Status:
Completed
Completed
Trial end date:
2018-05-16
2018-05-16
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
All
All
Summary
This is a switch study to assess the non-inferiority (in terms of efficacy and safety) of darunavir (boosted with ritonavir, DRV/r 400mg/100mg daily) when compared with lopinavir (boosted with ritonavir, LPV/r total dose 800mg/200mg daily), in combination with a nucleoside backbone, administered as a second line therapy in HIV positive individuals.Phase:
Phase 3Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
Accepts Healthy VolunteersDetails
Lead Sponsor:
Willem Daniel Francois VenterCollaborator:
Medical Research Council, South AfricaTreatments:
Darunavir
Lopinavir
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Ritonavir
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:- Participant is aged ≥18 years
- Participant weight >40kg
- Participant is on a LPV/r-containing regimen for at least 6 months with no history of
other protease inhibitors
- Participant has a plasma HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL in the last 60 days
- Participant is informed and has the ability to comprehend the full nature and purpose
of the study, and give voluntary written informed consent before inclusion in the
study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who are taking any antiretrovirals other than nucleoside/nucleotide
reverse transcriptase inhibitors and LPV/r
- Any prior history of genotype-documented protease inhibitor resistance
- Participants who are taking rifampicin or any other therapy with major cytochrome P450
interactions, within the last month
- Participants who are allergic to sulphonamides
- Participants who have a current history of drug or alcohol abuse that, in the opinion
of the investigator, may be an impediment to participant adherence to the protocol
- Female participants who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding
- Female participants desiring pregnancy during the next year
- Participants who have a strong likelihood of relocating far enough to make access to
the study site difficult
- Any condition(s) or laboratory report that, in the opinion of the investigator, might
put the participant at risk, or interfere with the study objectives or the
participant's adherence to study requirements