Overview
Gemcitabine - Oxaliplatin for Advanced Refractory Thyroid Cancer Patients: a Phase II Study
Status:
Terminated
Terminated
Trial end date:
2019-01-15
2019-01-15
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
All
All
Summary
Radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer is a rare tumor and therapeutic options are limited in this setting. Molecular targeted therapies have recently been developed for progressive disease and demonstrated clinical activity, especially with anti-angiogenic agents. For patients with contra-indication to these agents or in case of progression or toxicity during treatment, chemotherapy is usually proposed but this strategy has not been validated by prospective data. The investigators propose to conduct an open single arm phase 2 study to evaluate response rate according to RECIST 1.1 with GEMOX regimen (gemcitabine - oxaliplatin combination) for advanced radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer patients after anti-angiogenic agents or in case of contra-indication to anti-angiogenic therapy.Phase:
Phase 2Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
NoDetails
Lead Sponsor:
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTreatments:
Gemcitabine
Oxaliplatin
Criteria
"Main Inclusion criteria1. Histologically confirmed differentiated or poorly differentiated thyroid cancer that
is metastatic or unresectable
2. Patients refractory to radio iodine
3. Radiologic evidence of clinically relevant disease progression (as per RECIST 1.1)
4. Measurable disease (by RECIST Version 1.1 criteria)
5. ECOG performance status of ≤ 1
6. Adequate hematologic, renal and liver function
7. Negative serum pregnancy test in premenopausal women.
8. Signed informed consent
Main Non-Inclusion criteria
1. Other histological subtypes of thyroid tumors: anaplastic, medullary, lymphoma or
sarcoma
2. Active CNS metastases
3. Prior chemotherapy. Patients treated previously with molecular targeted therapies
could be included.
4. Severe, acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality
which in the judgment of the investigator would make the patient inappropriate for
entry into this study"