How Successful is Supplemental Intraseptal Anaesthesia in Patients With Mandibular Teeth Extraction or Irreversible Pulpitis

• Status: Completed
• Trial end date: 2019-09-08
• Target enrollment: 0
• Participant gender: All

Summary

Introduction:

Local anesthetic failure is an unavoidable aspect of dental practice. A number of factors contribute to this, which may be related to either the patient or the operator. Patient-dependent factors may be anatomical, pathological or psychological1-3. Work is still going on by dental clinicians and researchers in order to find an optimal local anesthetic agent which it has a high potency and rapid onset of action.4-6. However, pain free injection also play a role in improving the patient perceptions toward the dentist and dental treatments and encouraging patients to attend a regular checkup5-8.

Failure of the local anaesthetic injections using Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB) for lower teeth in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients requires additional buck-up strategies to achieve pain free dental treatment. Otherwise, the patient complains of severe pain and hindering the clinician to proceed to the dental treatment.

Mechanism of action for intraseptal injection The route of diffusion and distribution of the anaesthetic solution in the intraseptal technique is most likely through the medullary bone (Fig. 1). It offers anaesthesia to the bone, delicate/soft tissues, root structure in the region of infusion. It is best when both pain control and haemostasis are wanted for delicate /soft tissue and bony periodontal treatment.

Figure 1: Represents the point of needle insertion for the Intraseptal Injection and the position of the needle 3mm apical to the apex of the papillary triangle5.

Advantages of intraseptal injection In contrast to IANB and local infiltration, the intraseptal technique prevents the anaesthesia of tissues such as lips and tongue hence, decreases the chances of cheek or lip biting (self-trauma). It necessitates minimum or least dosage of local anaesthetic and minimizes bleeding during the surgical procedure. This technique being less traumatic, has immediate or instantaneous (<30-sec) onset of action and comparatively less number of postsurgical complications14. Intravascular injection is extremely unlikely to occur15compared to IANB or infiltration. Assertions that intraseptal anaesthesia is immediate are properly consistent with previous clinical results. Their findings reported that the onset of action for anaesthesia was within one minute after injection. So the onset time can be considered rapid if not immediate.

Disadvantages of intraseptal Injection Clinical experience and multiple tissue punctures may be necessary to perform this technique. During the anaesthetic procedure, the anaesthetic solution may leak in to the oral cavity resulting discomfort and an unpleasant or bitter taste. The effective period anaesthesia for pulpal and soft-tissues is very limited20 hence multiple repeats may be required for longer surgical procedures.

The aim of this prospective clinical study is to determine the anesthetic efficacy of the supplemental intraseptal technique in mandibular teeth diagnosed with extraction when the conventional inferior alveolar

• Phase: Phase 1
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers?: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Details

• Lead Sponsor: Taibah University
• Treatments: Anesthetics; Carticaine; Epinephrine; Epinephryl borate; Lidocaine; Racepinephrine

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• 18-70 years of age,

• In good health (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I or II) and

• Having one non-surgical tooth for extraction.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Allergy to local anesthetics,

• History of significant medical problems (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III or greater),

• Having recently taken central nervous system depressants (including alcohol or any analgesic medications within 6 hours before treatment),

• Pregnancy, lactating, or

• Inability to give informed consent.