Overview

Intranasal Midazolam Versus Intranasal Ketamine to Sedate Newborns for Intubation in Delivery Room

Status:
Unknown status
Trial end date:
2016-05-01
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
All
Summary
Anesthesia is rarely used to intubate newborns in delivery room because of the very difficulty of accessing veins. The investigators hypothesized that intranasal administration of sedative would be an effective alternative. -Midazolam and Ketamine are two drugs used during neonates' intubation. They are also used intranasally in the absence of venous access-In a pilot study the investigators have demonstrated that sedation with Midazolam was effective in 67% of the patients. Efficiency was defined by a specific pain score: FANS < 4 (Faceless Acute Neonatal Pain Scale) and by an impedancemetric Pain monitor < 0.2 spike/s. The investigators hypothesized that intranasal ketamine would increase procedure effectiveness from 67 to 90%. - Main objective: To compare newborns sedation quality as they are sedated either by intranasal Midazolam or by intranasal Ketamine during intubation in delivery room. - Secondary Objectives: To compare intubation quality, hemodynamic and respiratory tolerance, and neurological outcomeat 2 years within the two groups.
Phase:
Phase 3
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
No
Details
Lead Sponsor:
University Hospital, Montpellier
Treatments:
Ketamine
Midazolam
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

- Neonates in delivery room

- Presence of respiratory distress syndrom requiring intubation (Silverman score> 3 and
/ or FiO2 greater than 30 % in premature infants under 30 weeks and over 40% after 30
weeks

- Hemodynamic stability (mean arterial pressure> 3° percentile)

Exclusion Criteria:

- Need for intubation in extreme emergency (pneumothorax, meconium aspiration,
congenital diaphragmatic hernia, perinatal asphyxia)

- Birth in the absence of an independent appraiser

- Mother under general anesthesia