Overview

Intravenous Versus Oral Iron Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients

Status:
Recruiting
Trial end date:
2022-07-31
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
All
Summary
This study is aim to compare the efficacy of intravenous versus oral iron therapy regarding the hemoglobin levels, iron status and erythropoietin dosage in maintenance hemodialysis patients
Phase:
Phase 3
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
No
Details
Lead Sponsor:
Chiang Mai University
Treatments:
Ferrous fumarate
Folic Acid
Iron
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

- Age >18 years

- Hemodialysis for at least 3 months

- Hemoglobin levels between 8 and 11.5 g/dl inclusive

- Transferrin saturation (TSAT) <50% and ferritin <800 mg/dl

- Stable dose of epoetin of any types and iron therapy for at least 1 month

Exclusion Criteria:

- History of iron allergy

- Pregnant or lactating women

- Patients with known hematologic disorders other than anemia of renal disease and iron
deficiency anemia

- Patients with hemoglobinopathy e.g., thalassemia

- Patients with iron overload or hemochromatosis

- Patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhage during 6 months before enrolment in to the
study

- Patients with current severe infection

- Patients with any malignancies

- Patients with severe psychiatric illness

- Patients with any other medical condition which, in the Investigator's judgment, may
be associated with increased risk to the subject or may interfere with study
assessments or outcomes

- Patients who currently receive medications that can altered gastrointestinal
absorption of oral iron e.g., aluminum carbonate, aluminum hydroxide, chloramphenicol,
dimercaprol