Overview
Intravenous Versus Oral Iron Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients
Status:
Recruiting
Recruiting
Trial end date:
2022-07-31
2022-07-31
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
All
All
Summary
This study is aim to compare the efficacy of intravenous versus oral iron therapy regarding the hemoglobin levels, iron status and erythropoietin dosage in maintenance hemodialysis patientsPhase:
Phase 3Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
NoDetails
Lead Sponsor:
Chiang Mai UniversityTreatments:
Ferrous fumarate
Folic Acid
Iron
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:- Age >18 years
- Hemodialysis for at least 3 months
- Hemoglobin levels between 8 and 11.5 g/dl inclusive
- Transferrin saturation (TSAT) <50% and ferritin <800 mg/dl
- Stable dose of epoetin of any types and iron therapy for at least 1 month
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of iron allergy
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Patients with known hematologic disorders other than anemia of renal disease and iron
deficiency anemia
- Patients with hemoglobinopathy e.g., thalassemia
- Patients with iron overload or hemochromatosis
- Patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhage during 6 months before enrolment in to the
study
- Patients with current severe infection
- Patients with any malignancies
- Patients with severe psychiatric illness
- Patients with any other medical condition which, in the Investigator's judgment, may
be associated with increased risk to the subject or may interfere with study
assessments or outcomes
- Patients who currently receive medications that can altered gastrointestinal
absorption of oral iron e.g., aluminum carbonate, aluminum hydroxide, chloramphenicol,
dimercaprol