Overview
Ketamine Versus Fentanyl as an Adjunct to Propofol-Assisted Emergency Department Procedural Sedation
Status:
Completed
Completed
Trial end date:
2006-08-01
2006-08-01
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
All
All
Summary
We, the investigators at Queen's University, propose to conduct a randomized, double-blind, feasibility trial comparing low-dose ketamine versus fentanyl as adjuncts to Emergency Department procedural sedation with propofol. The outcomes of interest will be safety, with respect to hemodynamic and respiratory adverse effects, as well as efficacy, with respect to adequacy of sedation and analgesia, recovery profiles and patient/physician satisfaction. Our hypothesis, based on a review of existing anesthesia literature, is that low-dose ketamine may be a safer and more efficacious alternative to fentanyl when used as an adjunct to propofol-assisted procedural sedation.Phase:
N/AAccepts Healthy Volunteers?
NoDetails
Lead Sponsor:
Queen's UniversityCollaborator:
The Physicians' Services Incorporated FoundationTreatments:
Fentanyl
Ketamine
Propofol
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:- Individuals presenting or referred to the Emergency Department at Kingston General
Hospital with a fracture or dislocation requiring manipulation under procedural
sedation; or abscess requiring incision and drainage under procedural sedation.
- Ability to provide informed consent according to institutional requirements.
- Ability to comprehend and communicate in English.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 14 or > 65 years
- Any history of significant active cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic or renal disease, as
determined by patient history, chart review, or emergency physician.
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification greater than class II.
- Body mass > 130 kg.
- A history of physician-diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea.
- Chronic use of opioids including methadone and buprenorphine.
- A self-reported history of recent substance abuse or prior opioid dependence.
- Acute intoxication with drugs or alcohol, based on the judgement of the attending
physician.
- A history of psychotic disorders, as reported by subjects or identified on review of
the medical records.
- A known history of allergy or sensitivity to any study medication.