Overview

Laser-Ranibizumab-Triamcinolone for Diabetic Macular Edema

Status:
Completed
Trial end date:
2014-02-01
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
All
Summary
The purpose of the study is to find out which is a better treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME): laser alone, laser combined with an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone, laser combined with an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, or intravitreal injection of ranibizumab alone. At the present time, it is not known whether intravitreal steroid or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, with or without laser treatment, are better than just laser by itself. It is possible that one or both of the types of injections, with or without laser treatment, will improve vision more often than will laser without injections. However, even if better vision outcomes are seen with injections, side effects may be more of a problem with the injections than with laser. Therefore, this study is conducted to find out whether the benefits of the injections will outweigh the risks.
Phase:
Phase 3
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
No
Details
Lead Sponsor:
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Collaborators:
Allergan
Genentech, Inc.
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Treatments:
Bevacizumab
Ranibizumab
Triamcinolone
Triamcinolone Acetonide
Triamcinolone diacetate
Triamcinolone hexacetonide
Criteria
General Inclusion Criteria

To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria (1-5) must be met:

- Age >= 18 years

- Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2)

- At least one eye meets the study eye criteria

- Fellow eye (if not a study eye) meets criteria

- Able and willing to provide informed consent

General Exclusion Criteria

A subject is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present:

- Significant renal disease, defined as a history of chronic renal failure requiring
dialysis or kidney transplant.

- A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in
the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular
disease, and glycemic control).

- Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that
involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval at the time
of study entry.

- Known allergy to any component of the study drug.

- Blood pressure > 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110).

- Major surgery within 28 days prior to randomization or major surgery planned during
the next 6 months.

- Myocardial infarction, other cardiac event requiring hospitalization, stroke,
transient ischemic attack, or treatment for acute congestive heart failure within 4
months prior to randomization.

- Systemic anti-vascular growth factor (anti-VEGF) or pro-VEGF treatment within 4 months
prior to randomization.

- For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become
pregnant within the next 12 months.

- Subject is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not
covered by another clinical center during the first 12 months of the study.

Study Eye Inclusion Criteria

The subject must have one eye meeting all of the inclusion criteria and none of the
exclusion criteria listed below. A subject may have two study eyes only if both are
eligible at the time of randomization.

- Best corrected electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy (E-ETDRS) visual acuity
letter score <= 78 (i.e., 20/32 or worse) and >= 24 (i.e., 20/320 or better) within 8
days of randomization.

- On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema involving
the center of the macula.

- Ocular coherence tomography (OCT) central subfield >=250 microns within 8 days of
randomization.

- Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and subject cooperation sufficient for adequate
fundus photographs.

- If prior macular photocoagulation has been performed, the investigator believes that
the study eye may possibly benefit from additional photocoagulation.

Study Eye Exclusion Criteria

The following exclusions apply to the study eye only (i.e., they may be present for the
nonstudy eye):

- Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.

- An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual
acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy,
pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition).

- An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the
investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of
the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease,
neovascular glaucoma, etc.)

- Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be
decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity
to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal).

- History of treatment for diabetic macular edema at any time in the past 4 months (such
as focal/grid macular photocoagulation, intravitreal or peribulbar corticosteroids,
anti-VEGF drugs, or any other treatment).

- History of panretinal (scatter) photocoagulation (PRP) within 4 months prior to
randomization.

- Anticipated need for PRP in the 6 months following randomization.

- History of major ocular surgery (including vitrectomy, cataract extraction, scleral
buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 4 months or anticipated within the
next 6 months following randomization.

- History of yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior
to randomization.

- Aphakia.

- Intraocular pressure >= 25 mmHg.

- History of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of
open-angle glaucoma; note: history of angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion
criterion).

- History of steroid-induced intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation that required
IOP-lowering treatment.

- History of prior herpetic ocular infection.

- Exam evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis.

- Exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation.

- Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or
significant blepharitis.