Miniflare Versus Long Protocol in Poor Responders

• Status: Unknown status
• Trial end date: 2016-09-01
• Target enrollment: 0
• Participant gender: Female

Summary

The study is performed to compare the outcomes of two stimulation protocols, the minidose long protocol versus the microdose flare protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI.

• Phase: N/A
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers?: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Details

• Lead Sponsor: Woman's Health University Hospital, Egypt
• Treatments: Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptives, Oral; Contraceptives, Oral, Combined; Triptorelin Pamoate

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

• poor responder women who fulfilled the criteria defined by the ESHRE consensus in 2011[4]; Poor responder females are those who possess two out of these three criteria: i) Female age ≥40 years; ii) Females who have at least one previous cancelled IVF cycle; iii) POR according to AFC ≤5 or low AMH value.

Exclusion Criteria:

• females with FSH more than 20 IU/L

• females with previous ovarian surgery

• females suffering from causes of infertility other than poor ovarian response, cases with polycystic ovaries syndrome

• females refusing to be enrolled in the study, females with any endocrine disorder such as: diabetes, thyroid

• patients with male factor of infertility.