Stability Comparison of TIVA and Sevoflurane in Prone Spinal Surgery(TIVA:Total Intravenous Anesthesia)
Status:
COMPLETED
Trial end date:
2024-06-30
Target enrollment:
Participant gender:
Summary
Key Points:
1. Objective:
o To compare the effects of Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) and sevoflurane anesthesia on respiratory mechanics, hemodynamic parameters, and neuromonitoring during prone position spinal surgeries.
2. Methodology:
* A randomized controlled trial involving 52 patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery, randomly assigned to either TIVA or sevoflurane groups.
* Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were measured at various time points.
3. Results:
* No significant differences were found between the TIVA and sevoflurane groups in terms of respiratory mechanics or hemodynamic stability.
* Both anesthesia techniques maintained stable intraoperative conditions.
4. Clinical Implications:
* Anesthesiologists can flexibly choose between TIVA and sevoflurane based on patient-specific factors and surgical requirements.
* TIVA may be preferred in surgeries with high neurological risk due to its compatibility with neuromonitoring.
5. Future Research:
* Studies with broader patient populations and long-term outcomes are needed to further refine anesthesia management strategies.
* Research on the environmental impact and cost-effectiveness of anesthesia techniques is also important.