Overview

Surgicel® & Endometrial Ablation in the Management of Perimenpausal Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

Status:
Unknown status
Trial end date:
2018-02-01
Target enrollment:
0
Participant gender:
Female
Summary
Two hundred & forty patients aged from 40 to 50 years - complaining of heavy menstrual bleeding that is unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment & requesting conservative surgical approach- were randomized into 3 groups; group A (Surgicel group) in which 80 patients underwent formal curettage followed by insertion of 4 pieces of Surgicel inside the uterine cavity, group B (Thermal balloon ablation group) in which 80 patients underwent thermal balloon ablation using bipolar radiofrequency electrical energy (Novasure), group C (Endometrial resection group) in which 80 patients underwent transcervical Hysteroscopic endometrial resection.All patients were followed up over duration of 18 months following the procedure (at 3,6,12 & 18 months). Primary outcome included amenorrhea rates
Phase:
Phase 2
Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Details
Lead Sponsor:
Cairo University
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

- Heavy menstrual bleeding (i.e. pictorial blood loss assessment chart score >150) that
unresponsive to hormonal lines of treatment & requesting conservative surgical
approach.

- Uterine length <12 cm.

- FSH level > 40 IU/L

- Normal Pap smear

- Benign endometrial pathology

Exclusion Criteria:

- Active form of PID

- Uterine scars & uterine malformation.

- Uterine organic lesions (e.g., fibroids, polyps & Adenomyosis)

- Previous history of endometrial ablation.

- Patients seeking fertility preservation.

- Patients suffering coagulopathies or receiving anticoagulant treatments