Overview
The Comparison of Efficacy for Cervical Ripening in Labor Induction Between Titrated and Conventional Oral Misoprostol
Status:
Completed
Completed
Trial end date:
2010-03-01
2010-03-01
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
Female
Female
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy for cervical ripening in labor induction between titrated and conventional oral misoprostolPhase:
Phase 4Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
Accepts Healthy VolunteersDetails
Lead Sponsor:
Mahidol UniversityTreatments:
Misoprostol
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:- age 18 years old or more
- singleton pregnancy at 37 weeks gestation or more
- cephalic presentation
- reassuring fetal heart rate pattern
- admission for labor induction due to medical or obstetrical conditions
- bishop score less than 6
- giving consent and having signed the consent form for this study
Exclusion Criteria:
- parity more than 3
- estimated fetal weight more than 3,500 grams
- non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern
- having contraindication for vaginal delivery
- previous uterine scar
- suspected abruptio placenta with non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern
- abnormal bleeding per vagina, except bloody show
- PROM
- having underlying cardiac, hepatic, or renal diseases
- having history of allergy to misoprostol or prostaglandin analogues
- cervical dilatation 3 centimeters or more
- uterine contraction 3 times or more in 10 minute