Overview
The Efficacy and Safety of Oral Etrasimod as Therapy for Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease
Status:
Not yet recruiting
Not yet recruiting
Trial end date:
2025-08-31
2025-08-31
Target enrollment:
0
0
Participant gender:
All
All
Summary
Objectives: Primary Objectives Substudy A - Phase 2 - To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of 2 doses of etrasimod as induction therapy in subjects with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD) Substudy 1 - Phase 2b - To evaluate the dose-response relationship of 2 doses of etrasimod versus placebo as induction therapy in subjects with moderately to severely active CD - To select an oral etrasimod dose(s), based on efficacy and safety, for continued development Substudy 2 - Induction (Phase 3) - To evaluate the efficacy of the selected etrasimod dose versus placebo as induction therapy in subjects with moderately to severely active CD Substudy 3 - Maintenance (Phase 3) - To evaluate the efficacy of etrasimod versus placebo as maintenance therapy in subjects with moderately to severely active CD Substudy 4 - Long-Term Extension - To evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of etrasimod in subjects with moderately to severely active CD Secondary Objectives Substudy A - Phase 2 - To evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of etrasimod in subjects with moderately to severely active CD - To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic effects of etrasimod as induction and maintenance therapy, including changes in lymphocytes, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fecal calprotectin (FCP) in subjects with moderately to severely active CDSubstudy 1 - Phase 2b - To evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of etrasimod in subjects with moderately to severely active CD - To provide a subset of the target study population, etrasimod responders, to be evaluated in Substudy 3 - Maintenance Substudy 2 - Induction (Phase 3) - To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the selected etrasimod Phase 3 dose (3 mg or 2 mg) versus placebo as induction therapy in subjects with moderately to severely active CD - To provide a subset of the target study population, etrasimod responders, to be evaluated in Substudy 3 - Maintenance Substudy 3 - Maintenance (Phase 3) - To evaluate the efficacy of etrasimod on sustained clinical remission and endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and corticosteroid-free clinical remission in subjects with moderately to severely active CD - To characterize the safety and tolerability of etrasimod as maintenance therapy in subjects with moderately to severely active CD Substudy 4 - Long-Term Extension - To evaluate the long-term efficacy of etrasimod in subjects with moderately to severely active CDPhase:
Phase 2/Phase 3Accepts Healthy Volunteers?
NoDetails
Lead Sponsor:
Samia Hassan El-ShishtawyCollaborator:
Arena Pharmaceuticals
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:- Subjects 18 to 80 years of age, inclusive, at the time of consent
- Ability to provide written informed consent and to be compliant with the schedules of
protocol assessments
- Have CD for ≥ 3 months prior to randomization, involving the ileum and/or colon, at a
minimum; diagnosis may be confirmed at any time in the past by endoscopy and/or
histopathology. The screening endoscopy and histopathology reports may serve as source
documents for subjects who do not have diagnostic endoscopy reports in their medical
chart
- Have moderately to severely active CD at Screening, defined as:
- CDAI score ≥ 220 and ≤ 450
- Unweighted average worst daily AP (kg) score ≥ 2 (using a 4-point scale; ie, 0 [none]
to 3 [severe]) OR unweighted average daily loose (kg)/watery SF (Bristol Stool Form
Scale [BSFS] type 6 or 7) score ≥ 4
- SES-CD of ≥ 6 or SES-CD ≥ 4 for subjects with isolated ileal disease, Demonstrated
inadequate response, loss of response to, or intolerance to ≥ 1 of the following
therapies for the treatment of CD: Oral corticosteroids (eg, prednisone [or its
equivalent] or budesonide Immunosuppressants (eg, AZA, 6-mercaptopurine [6-MP], or
MTX)
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of inadequate response (ie, primary non-response) to agents from ≥ 2 classes
of biologics marketed for the treatment of CD (ie, TNFα antagonists,
interleukin-12/-23 antagonist, and integrin receptor antagonist, refer to Appendix 9)
- Have stopped, started, or changed the dosage of oral 5-ASA compounds ≤ 2 weeks prior
to randomization or do not intend to maintain the same dose during the study
- 3Have stopped, started, or changed the dosage of oral corticosteroids (prednisone ≤ 20
mg/day or its equivalent, budesonide ≤ 9 mg/day) ≤ 2 weeks prior to randomization
- Have a confirmed ALC < 800 cells/mm3 (< 0.8 × 109 cells/L) at Screening or confirmed
absolute neutrophil count < 1000 cells/mm3 (< 1.0 × 109 cells/L) at Screening
- Have confirmed aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2
× upper limit of normal (ULN) and total bilirubin > 1.5 × ULN (unless consistent with
a history of Gilbert's Syndrome) at Screening