Overview

VAH Versus VA for Salvage Therapy of R/R-AML

Status:
Recruiting
Trial end date:
2023-12-31
Target enrollment:
Participant gender:
Summary
This is a prospective, multi-center, phase 3 randomized controlled clinical study comparing VAH and VA regimens for the salvage treatment of the patients with relapsed/refractory AML. Approximately 164 subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive VAH regimen (82 subjects) or VA regimen (82 subjects) for salvage therapy. Randomization is done with permuted blocks (block size four), and implemented through an interactive web-based response system. VAH regimen: VEN begins at 100 mg on day 1 and increases stepwise over 3 days to reach the target dose of 400 mg (100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg); dosing is continued at 400 mg per day from day 4 through day 14; azacitidine (75 mg/m²) is administered subcutaneously on days 1-7, and HHT (1 mg/m²) on days 1-7. VA regimen: The use of VEN is just the same as it dose in VAH regimen except lasting for 28 days. The use of azacitidine is exactly the same as VAH group does. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) after 2 cycles of trial therapy. The secondary endpoints were CRc after 2 cycles of trial therapy, overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and relapse at 2 year, and safety.
Phase:
Phase 3
Details
Lead Sponsor:
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
Collaborators:
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
First People's Hospital of Chenzhou
Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Southern Medical University, China
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Zhongshan People's Hospital, Guangdong, China
Treatments:
Azacitidine
Homoharringtonine